From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 6 13:40:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8461D14EFA for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:40:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA10567; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:34:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:34:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199904062034.NAA10567@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: paul@originative.co.uk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: EGCS optimizations References: <63443.923429497@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> it a few times to build the cache before timing it. : :What is the stddev on your measurements ? : :a delta-T 1 second need a very tight stddev to be significant. The timing was +/- 0.5 second ( I ran the test four times ). But, remember, this is not comparing against GCC. This was simply comparing various EGCC optimization features. stddev on ~160 seconds +/- 0.5s is basically 0, so it is not a useful measurement beyond noting that it is near 0. I would love to see a comparison against GCC. I blew away my GCC :-( and do not want to spend time reinstalling it. :-- :Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member :phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." :FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message