From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 19:58:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC57716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:58:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAC843D1F for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.5.50] (adsl-64-171-186-95.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.171.186.95]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iBUJvwGV002364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:58:00 -0800 Message-ID: <41D45DC3.6000509@root.org> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:57:55 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Federico Galvez-Durand Besnard References: <41D4471E.4060007@del.ufrj.br> In-Reply-To: <41D4471E.4060007@del.ufrj.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi boot error messages after last update (Dec 22nd and 29th) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:58:11 -0000 Federico Galvez-Durand Besnard wrote: > I am getting boot error messages. > > http://www.del.ufrj.br/~fico/FreeBSD/debug/dmesg03 > > Apparently, my Notebook works well . > I did not have these error messages before > last big acpi update. > > Before that update dmesg was like this: > http://www.del.ufrj.br/~fico/FreeBSD/debug/dmesg01 > > My ASL compiles with warnings, 0 errors: > http://www.del.ufrj.br/~fico/FreeBSD/debug/toshiba2805-s301.asl > http://www.del.ufrj.br/~fico/FreeBSD/debug/toshiba2805-s301_iasl.output Hmm, it appears that the implicit return part of the interpreter is not working correctly. For instance, LNKA has an implicit return of the result of the STAL() method. I can't figure out why this wouldn't be working though. We have enabled the InterpreterSlack global and are running with ACPI-CA 20041119. Any ideas, Bob? Here's where we enable InterpreterSlack: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c.diff?r1=1.186.2.7&r2=1.186.2.8&f=h -- Nate