From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 4 13:54:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24E237B401; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABF843F93; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:54:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h54Ks8kA025468; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:54:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:54:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030604.145404.88473317.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jhb@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <20030604085348.A4BE398E7E@blow.research.canon.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: cableboy@charter.net cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2311] ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 20:54:46 -0000 In message: John Baldwin writes: : I'm currently working on making the PCI interrupt routing work for SMP : and once that is done I plan to commit a change to make this : : #if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__i386__) : : However, if people find that the above patch fixes a lot of UP : machines for now I might commit it. I know that my Fiva 205 works with ACPI as long as I enter the right overrides to get the right interrupts. I've been using something similar. However, why not all architectures? Warner