From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 30 20:24:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F50F16A4FF for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B7E43D6E for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:24:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FDED9F5A5 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:24:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.internal ([10.202.2.160]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:24:35 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: cvI5HTZJB3sL8pE2zUBsrYYEOH6Y5AY4F12vDx9chM3h 1156969474 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5847766 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:24:34 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:24:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608302124.21833.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Mounting Linux Procfs at Boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:24:52 -0000 What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time? I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab: linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 But in a standard installation, this mount-point is really under /usr, which isn't mounted until pass 2. If I change the pass number to 2, it fails with an "unexpected inconsistencies" error. I presume this is because mount is trying to fsck it, and failing to find fsck_linprocfs.