From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 14:13:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F5116A4B3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75B3C43FF5 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:13:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 7340 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Oct 2003 21:13:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:13:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Mike Hunter In-Reply-To: <20031007205306.GB23040@ack.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: <20031007141105.D7263@root.org> References: <20031005195107.GA24142@ack.Berkeley.EDU> <20031007133444.R7172@root.org> <20031007205306.GB23040@ack.Berkeley.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2722] Re: Dell D800 ACPI Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:13:17 -0000 On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Mike Hunter wrote: > On Oct 07, "Nate Lawson" wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Mike Hunter wrote: > > > I am trying to get acpi to work better on my Dell D800. I see the > > > following warning message when I boot: > > > > > > -0166: *** Error: UtAllocate: Attempt to allocate zero bytes > > > -0166: *** Error: UtAllocate: Attempt to allocate zero bytes > > > -0166: *** Error: UtAllocate: Attempt to allocate zero bytes > > > -0166: *** Error: UtAllocate: Attempt to allocate zero bytes > > > > > > It repeats that quite a bit. > > > > I've been following down this issue. It is known. > > Thanks. I'm happy to test patches and such, just let me know. > > Also, thanks for the advice about staying away from s[234]...it might be worth > mentioning in the acpiconf man page that they are experimental. I'll also try > the config change you suggested for closing the lid. Well, it's kind of a given that ACPI as a whole is experimental although becoming more vital every day. Suspend and resume are the areas that will continue to have problems even as other areas stabilize. This is a given from our APM experience 6 years ago. -Nate