Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:45:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 278280] [NEW PORT] dns/py-libknot: Python bindings for libknot Message-ID: <bug-278280-7788-vx4usPDqHQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-278280-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-278280-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D278280 Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd@dns.company> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #249910| |maintainer-approval- Flags| | --- Comment #3 from Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd@dns.company> --- Created attachment 249910 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D249910&action= =3Dedit the whole picture, adjusting dns/knot3, adding dns/py-libknot (In reply to Einar Bjarni Halld=C3=B3rsson from comment #1) NO_ARCH=3D yes should be below USE_PYTHON=3D autoplist concurrent distutils pep517 distutils i.c.w. pep517 is conflicting. distutils w/o pep517 works. pep517 is likely preferred, but fails building, unless you add devel/py-hatchling as build dependancy. I was trying to make this a metaport, as that would prevent version conflic= ts and double work. But it would make the Makefile of dns/knot3 even more overcomplicated. So instead I would like to take the approach as in attached patch. All mutations now validate perfectly with all the testing tools. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-278280-7788-vx4usPDqHQ>