From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 10:49:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A35106566B for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4928FC19 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67586D41B; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 91CF6844A1; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:49:38 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Alexander Best References: Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:49:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Alexander Best's message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:28:31 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <86fxac62il.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HAMMER FS port (status ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:49:40 -0000 Alexander Best writes: > i remember a discussion about HAMMER support on one of the mailingslists = which > sorta ended with the following statement: > > "let's get zfs running properly before we even think about starting with > HAMMER." Not a valid argument; regardless of the state of ZFS, one does not preclude the other unless you expect the same person to handle both. The one and only reason why HAMMER is not in the base system is that nobody has stepped forward to do it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no