From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 11:33:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8060A106564A for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9858FC14 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013D79CB204; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zsKk76DdIAj6; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4B59CB2CC; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:08 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0ABX8x0026335; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:08 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Message-ID: <20090110113308.GA25584@freebsd.org> References: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:22 -0000 On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:22:38PM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > FWIW, > > I had some informal talk with brooks@ about this at EuroBSDCon: > > - groff(1) needs a C++ compiler so clang is not (yet) an option for the time being we will have to live with GCC or llvm-gcc. I guess once the switch happens we are going to live for some with both gcc and clang/llvm. I also guess that by the time the switch happens clang is going to be full C++ capable :)