From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 19 14:15:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89EB5762; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62AF722ED; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v10so2578301pde.14 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:15:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=6hI2I8u0/wggAJxOiJt05gjQLDZZk0rzVjJhmkgbQVk=; b=YMu8sXL769J4TkXC+bnRjpRSUBE8N9la+lTu8TRNGuZ0rCNY1X2Dr7CD5DFPMc3Kj/ S/lJvVjNfstwv+c9ZJDN6CLlrqxb89zTMgo9u86aE5/aAwe28T/ZxQ5DRAxnbY7LxAU3 PjCY16xzKLg+EtOqZYMrsEqtHVrhn1+/q8lRlyYR9QFImVNuh4ipOOL+YHEfx/nU8mt/ ZgwR9GKbsfwNxy9BKe5XyE/XA634EFGyYdd5vtcLTw5N34lPu17rwpej/KTWARTzrfmt he0DpV22S9fAaJ7n19syb7xgKRpfKZu50YUbfIph3nifkhFOE91mGwR7q7out9v7285E wcWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.189.133 with SMTP id gi5mr26548352pbc.57.1384870520959; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:15:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.191.6 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:15:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:15:20 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6c3-cgT7t7Q8TkP6PRdlypDEtd0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug in dhclient / dhclient.conf / dhcp-options parser? From: CeDeROM To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:15:21 -0000 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:09 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > I have noticed that other options with names known to > dhcp-options and decimal numbers above 100 are sent correctly, so > maybe there is an error in the options number parser, or I do > something wrong? I have just tested value 88 (example below 100) and it works correctly, so parsing seems okay. Why some option numbers are treated in a different way then? :-( Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info