From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 15:58:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96261065676 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep15-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DB98FC22 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from edge03.upc.biz ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep15-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080924155813.DUWE3377.viefep15-int.chello.at@edge03.upc.biz> for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:58:13 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([89.134.230.13]) by edge03.upc.biz with edge id Jfxw1a03L0Hzgy103fxxSY; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:58:13 +0200 X-SourceIP: 89.134.230.13 Message-ID: <48DA6384.3080400@shopzeus.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:57:56 +0200 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <48D95A19.8030700@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: dovecot, maildir, UFS 2 performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:58:21 -0000 > You can treat UFS as ext2/3 with dir_index enabled by default (not > exactly but that's what dirhash translates to in practice). > UFS by default creates 2k fragments ("sub-blocks"), so in practice any > tuning in this direction won't do much. > More drives=better in this case. Don't forget to tune dirhash_maxmem. I think this is what I really wanted to know. Thank you! Laszlo