From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 16 23:38:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B1A37B424 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:38:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us) Received: from sm.socccd.cc.ca.us (pool0928.cvx14-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.179.41.163]) by swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA25064; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ADBE569.C0BC5724@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:40:41 -0700 From: Farooq Mela X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-RC i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Doug White , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lockf in apache References: <20010410131254.V15938@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010411161858.T15938@fw.wintelcom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > We haven't applied wakeup_one() to select() yet? (I think I've argued > > about this before.) > > > > Someone get cracking! :) > > I'm not sure it's possible without redesigning the way select works. > Perhaps its not possible, as I'm not very familiar with the way kqueue works, but would it be possible to rewrite select() to use the kqueue() mechanism underneath, and thus avoid this situation? Or am I missing something? -- farooq To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message