From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 10:23:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21ABD106566B for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@violetlan.net) Received: from mail.violetlan.net (host-80-81-242-13.violetlan.net [80.81.242.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF92E8FC0C for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@violetlan.net) Received: from mail.violetlan.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.violetlan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6C411460; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:24:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from www.violetlan.net (mbali.violetlan.net [10.0.100.150]) by mail.violetlan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7813411426; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:24:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from 217.41.34.61 (SquirrelMail authenticated user freebsd@violetlan.net) by www.violetlan.net with HTTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:23:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <53948.217.41.34.61.1209032621.squirrel@www.violetlan.net> In-Reply-To: References: <61065.217.41.34.61.1209026488.squirrel@www.violetlan.net> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:23:41 +0100 (BST) From: "Reinhold" To: "Ivan Voras" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: brindging ath0 with re0 working, kinda, almost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:23:08 -0000 On Thu, April 24, 2008 10:03, Ivan Voras wrote: > Reinhold wrote: > > >> I have a bridge set up on re0 and ath0 to get bridge0, here is my >> ifconfig >> >> ath0: flags=8943 metric >> 0 >> mtu 2290 > >> rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> > >> bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 >> mtu 1500 > >> The bridge is working in that both lan and wlan can access the internet >> perfectly well but the problem lies with accessing each other. > > Depending on what your symptoms are, maybe you need to set the mtu of > all three interfaces to the same value (1500). > Hi Thanks for the quick reply. The symptoms are as follows When connected to the wlan I can ping the firewall but not one of our servers, the server ip times out This is a ping from one of the laptops connected to the wlan >ping 192.168.1.1 Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms >ping 192.168.1.5 Pinging 192.168.1.5 with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 192.168.1.5: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), When I plug it in on the lan its works perfect with no time outs. How come is the MTU so low on the ath0, but its working at full speed? The wlan signal is stronger then any of our other wireless devices I've ever used before Regards