From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 17 09:47:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B6D75B2; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E981AB2; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3l5qQp0ZCCzbHM; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:46:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODyZ8MrIOJsw; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:46:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:46:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5507F80F.70609@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:46:55 +0100 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremie Le Hen Subject: Re: net/unison240 depends on lang/ocaml-nox11 References: <5507555C.7030508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:47:07 -0000 On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >>> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o). >>> >>> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240? >>> >> >> I never noticed this since it never happened to me and nobody else >> reported it. >> >> Anyway now that you draw my attention, yes, it needs fixing. >> >> Your patch looks correct, but please allow me a little time for some >> testing. > > OK thanks! :) Just committed it. Thanks again for reporting the issue! -- Guido Falsi