Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 01:28:30 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: chio trap with not-ready changer Message-ID: <20000301012830.B29274@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <200003010805.AAA04782@mass.cdrom.com>; from msmith@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 12:05:18AM -0800 References: <200003010803.AAA04730@mass.cdrom.com> <200003010805.AAA04782@mass.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 00:05:18 -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > Looks like it might want a TEST UNIT READY to clear the condition? > > > > > > Not necessarily a test unit ready, but perhaps something other than mode > > > sense or inquiry. > > > > > > *sigh* > > > > > > I still don't understand how the retry count is getting decremented. > > > > I think there's something basic wrong there, yes. Whatever it is also > > seems to be inhibiting the TEST UNIT READY that your quirk entry is > > trying to send. > > ... the rationale here being that if it was being sent and failing, we'd > see an error from it, right? Not necessarily. I don't think we print out sense information or errors if commands issued by the error recovery code result in errors. (That's often the point.) It's the original command that'll get reported as having failed. (And it really is a failure of the original command -- once we complete the error recovery action, the original command is reissued to see if it will complete successfully.) Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000301012830.B29274>