From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Dec 6 14:53:44 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 14:53:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00BA37B698; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by gw.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9FF94193E1; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:53:34 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:53:34 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Daniel Eischen Cc: Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads in the base system Message-ID: <20001206165334.D64011@spawn.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Daniel Eischen , Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200012062138.eB6Lc6t07375@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from eischen@vigrid.com on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:50:29PM -0500 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: nectar@nectar.com Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:50:29PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I was just [re]thinking about this. When we get libpthread (work > has just started on this), then libc_r will eventually go away. > It's not clear yet whether libpthread will exist as a separate > entity or whether it will evolve from libc_r. For the ignorant (me), what is/will be the difference between libc_r and libpthread? Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message