Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:59:55 +0200
From:      Ivan Radovanovic <rivanr@gmail.com>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Deprecating ps(1)s -w switch
Message-ID:  <4A93EE5B.8000300@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090825134447.GM2829@hoeg.nl>
References:  <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20090825134447.GM2829@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Schouten napisa:
> * Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>   
>> I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
>> originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
>>
>> The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
>> be safely deprecated.  ps goes to great lengths to implement width
>> limitations, and any time I've seen people not using -ww has either
>> been a mistake or doesn't matter.  Using 'cut -c1-N' is also a great
>> way of limiting widths if people really want that...
>>
>> I'd like to propose changing ps so that width limits are removed and
>> '-w' is deprecated - ignored for now with a note in the man page
>> saying that it will be removed in a future release.
>>
>> Does anyone have any objections to doing this?  I don't propose
>> merging this back into stable/8.
>>     
>
> So ps(1) output can never be limited to the screen width?
>   
I think it would be smart not to limit width by default (ie default 
behavior to be like with -ww), but to have some switch (like -w) to 
limit width if someone really needs to do that, although with "cut -c 
1-80" could be achieved limiting...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A93EE5B.8000300>