From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:21:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18CC16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:21:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4FA43D46 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:21:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0E3KGUd038585; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:20:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i0E3KGkE038582; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:20:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:20:16 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <40048955.70007@acm.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: John Kennedy Subject: Re: FreeBSD CVS Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 03:21:58 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Tim Kientzle wrote: > I have a FreeBSD box that's on all of the time (my NFS and Samba > server), so I just run cvsup from cron on that to copy the CVS repo, > then do a cvs checkout over NFS onto local work machines. FYI, I've often found that tunneling CVS over SSH is substantially faster than NFS. This appears to be a property of CVS doing some sort of explicit pipelining, whereas with NFS, it spends a lot of time blocked on synchronous stat() operations against the CVS repository. Of course, last time I used CVS over NFS seriously was on 10mbps ethernet, so this well be a non-event with gigabit. :-) Setting up the SSH connection is slightly more expensive, but the reduced apparent latency makes a big difference. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research