From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Nov 25 21:09:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA25268 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:09:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from calvin.saturn-tech.com (calvin.saturn-tech.com [207.229.19.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA25262; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:09:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drussell@saturn-tech.com) Received: from localhost (drussell@localhost) by calvin.saturn-tech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA23880; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 22:08:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from drussell@saturn-tech.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 22:08:34 -0700 (MST) From: Doug Russell To: Drew Baxter cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tell Micro$oft what you think In-Reply-To: <4.1.19981125234419.00a52100@genesis.ispace.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 25 Nov 1998, Drew Baxter wrote: > Personally I aim for hardware that works with just about anything. OS > Specific hardware (HSP modems, etc.) infringe on the regular home user that > just bought a Compaq from the local WalMart to install FreeBSD across a PPP > link... Now that I re-read my previous post, it doesn't really express what I wanted. I agree here... I'm saying Microsoft has messed things up, and that we would probably be using BETTER, even CHEAPER hardware if it were not for Microsoft. Later...... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message