From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 15 19:52:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB2B44A; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from so14k@valentine.liquidneon.com) Received: from valentine.liquidneon.com (cl-1479.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:5c6::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "valentine.liquidneon.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8552E682; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from so14k@valentine.liquidneon.com) Received: by valentine.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1018) id 560EF8FFCC; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:52:39 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:52:39 -0600 From: Brad Davis To: Bernard Spil Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r389740 - head Message-ID: <20150615195239.GA94853@valentine.liquidneon.com> References: <201506151731.t5FHVNdQ067619@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201506151731.t5FHVNdQ067619@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:52:50 -0000 On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:31:23PM +0000, Bernard Spil wrote: > Author: brnrd > Date: Mon Jun 15 17:31:22 2015 > New Revision: 389740 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/389740 > > Log: > Add rebuild of LibreSSL ports to UPDATING Eh? Why not just bump PORTREVISION on those ports? I know it will cause rebuilds for people not using libressl, but it.. Regards, Brad Davis