Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:18:32 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/p5-Archive-Any pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Archive-SimpleExtractor pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Compress-LZF pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Compress-LZO pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Compress-LZW pkg-plist ports/archiver Message-ID: <20100924071832.GB72615@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C9C4CDB.9000706@FreeBSD.org> References: <AANLkTi=9ZfAhdkAZ5dhXebM=4dpnnmC83Awg9O6EeED9@mail.gmail.com> <4C9C4CDB.9000706@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:01:47AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 9/23/2010 10:39 PM, Andrej Zverev wrote: > > Log: > > - only 13% of the p5- ports embed @comment $FreeBSD$: > > so standarize and remove it > > > >How about to explain the benefits of this? > > Speaking only for myself ... > > 1. Standardization is a good thing since so much stuff is copy/pasted Could you please describe standards and vote before doing anything. Thank you. > 2. The comments that were removed added no value, so This commit also have no additional value too. Thank you again. > 3. There was no harm in removing them. > > Philip may have additional/better answers. > Do you have a specific concern about them being removed, or were you > just curious? I'm totally disagree with Philip mass-commits as well as implicit approval from portmgrs. -- Sergey A. Osokin osa@FreeBSD.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100924071832.GB72615>