From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb  1 05:13:59 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA25184
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 05:13:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA25164
          Thu, 1 Feb 1996 05:13:52 -0800 (PST)
From: garyj@frt.dec.com
Received: from cssmuc.frt.dec.com by mail1.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 for V3.2/1.0/WV)
	id AA31869; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 05:05:20 -0800
Received: from localhost by cssmuc.frt.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Nov95-0232PM)
	id AA05947; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 14:05:17 +0100
Message-Id: <9602011305.AA05947@cssmuc.frt.dec.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95
To: ports%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com,
        hackers%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com
In-Reply-To: Message from Andreas Klemm <andreas@knobel.gun.de>  of Wed, 31 
 Jan 96 18:43:35 +0100.
Reply-To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com
Subject: Re: Pentium gcc port done 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 14:05:17 +0100
X-Mts: smtp
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


andreas@knobel.gun.de writes:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 1996, Satoshi Asami wrote:
> > I used the http site for the patch file instead of including the 800KB
> > file in the patches/ directory.
> 
> Very fine ! I wanted to do this, too, but noticed that the 
> hypertext link isn't pointing to a ftp server, bad luck ;-)
> 
> > The ftpget script we are testing now can handle this; and there is a 
> > copy on ftp.freebsd.org, so regular ncftp users will just get it from 
> > the backup site.
> 
> Ah, fine.
> 

didn't work for me, I had to grab the patch using netscape. And
ftp.cdrom.com was full up (600 users, amazing !).

I noticed that there's now a patch on the pgcc server dated 31.Jan.96.
Maybe we could look into using this instead ? This is supposed to be the
last patch until gcc 2.8.0 is released.

> > People, please benchmark it!  And thanks for the port, Andreas!
> 
> Well, was a pleasure between 10pm and 1am ;-) I got the idea, 
> when Paul Henning asked.

I tried to generate a -current kernel with it, no joy. Haven't tried
it with any user-land stuff yet.

---
Gary Jennejohn				(work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com
					(home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de
					(play) gj@freebsd.org