From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  5 13:37:26 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8182416A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  5 Mar 2005 13:37:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBDF43D49
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  5 Mar 2005 13:37:25 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from mat@mat.cc)
Received: from cc-171.int.t-online.fr (unknown [213.44.125.171])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC054B05F2;
	Sat,  5 Mar 2005 14:37:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:37:23 +0100
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
To: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@vlink.ru>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:44:36 +0000
Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:37:26 -0000

+-le 05/03/2005 16:11 +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov =E9crivait :
| Hi!
|=20
| Could anybody try to do
|=20
|   # mount_unionfs -r -o ro /rescue /mnt
|   # /mnt/tsch
|=20
| on 5.4 and tell me result? WARNING, it may trap you system!

I'm not answering to your question, but what's the need of a ro unionfs, a ro
nullfs would do the same, no ?

--=20
Mathieu Arnold