From owner-cvs-all  Thu Aug 26  9:47:26 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5E19515E96; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com)
Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
	by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA14966;
	Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:47:20 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com)
Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id KAA14805; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:47:19 -0600
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:47:19 -0600
Message-Id: <199908261647.KAA14805@mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/isofs/cd9660 cd9660_vfsops.c src/sys/kern
         vfs_subr.c vfs_syscalls.c src/sys/miscfs/devfs devfs_tree.c
         src/sys/miscfs/specfs spec_vnops.c src/sys/nfs nfs_subs.c
         src/sys/svr4 svr4_fcntl.c src/sys/sys conf.h lock.h vnode.h ...
In-Reply-To: <199908261453.HAA58170@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <199908261453.HAA58170@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

>   Modified files:
>     sys/isofs/cd9660     cd9660_vfsops.c 
>     sys/kern             vfs_subr.c vfs_syscalls.c 
>     sys/miscfs/devfs     devfs_tree.c 
>     sys/miscfs/specfs    spec_vnops.c 
>     sys/nfs              nfs_subs.c 
>     sys/svr4             svr4_fcntl.c 
>     sys/sys              conf.h lock.h vnode.h 
>     sys/ufs/mfs          mfs_vfsops.c 
>     sys/ufs/ufs          ufs_vnops.c 
>     sys/vm               vm_swap.c 
>   Log:
>   Simplify the handling of VCHR and VBLK vnodes using the new dev_t:
>   
>           Make the alias list a SLIST.
>   
>           Drop the "fast recycling" optimization of vnodes (including
>           the returning of a prexisting but stale vnode from checkalias).
>           It doesn't buy us anything now that we don't hardlimit
>           vnodes anymore.

Will this removal cause us to run out of KVM sooner on busy servers
because we are not GC'ing them as often?


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message