From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jan 18 4:21: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8F214EEE for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:20:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12AXcj-0002nj-00; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:20:37 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Omachonu Ogali Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Parent Logging Patch for sh(1) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:02:26 EST." Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:20:37 +0200 Message-ID: <10770.948198037@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:02:26 EST, Omachonu Ogali wrote: > My main focus was on BIND, I haven't seen someone yet who has smashed > the stack and changed argv[0], I must admit, I thought anything linked against libutil would be able to call setproctitle(3) (yes, I know that named doesn't). I also thought setproctitle(3) changes what you see via /proc. I could be wrong on either or both counts, but don't really feel like checking. ;-) Regardless, you should still take my advice and contact Robert Watson if you're really interested in contributing to FreeBSD security. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message