From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Oct 16 07:46:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA03037
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA03024
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net)
Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (shovey@buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA20621 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 10:46:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 10:46:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: 100baseTX and 2.0.5.R
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.971016104430.22010A-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


My 2.0.5.R sees the 100baseTX card as DE0 and it works fine on 10baseT,
but when I go to use the 100baseTX port, and I ifconfig de0 link2 I get
error lights flashing on my hub.

I have the same card, used the same hub and cable in a 2.1.5 and that
works.

Is there a bug in 2.0.5's 100baseTX portion of the de0 driver? or could I
have a bad card or something?