From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu May 23 17:11:51 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA07985
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 17:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.pacit.tas.gov.au (falcon.pacit.tas.gov.au [147.109.1.8])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA07956
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 May 1996 17:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sdd.pacit.tas.gov.au (sdd.pacit.tas.gov.AU [147.109.2.93]) by falcon.pacit.tas.gov.au (8.7.1/8.7) with SMTP id KAA14304; Fri, 24 May 1996 10:01:35 +1000 (EST)
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19960524000918.006ce2c4@147.109.1.8>
X-Sender: sdd@147.109.1.8
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 10:09:18 +1000
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
From: Scott Donovan <sdd@ccd.tas.gov.au>
Subject: Re: Missing Disk Space (df -k)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>10% was a good middle ground for a limit on degradation of hash
>efficiency.  8% makes people with *big* disks happy, of course,

 Hmm Depends on how you look at it.. I have lost 4 gbyte disk over the total
disk space. :-), and the system only writes to the disks once a day. I think
I am going to do a little fiddling with tunefs.. drop it down to 5% or
something... just to see what happens. 

If I can get another 330 Mbytes back I will be happy.. At least until I can
get the funding to buy some more disk.