From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 3 12:02:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA12768 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 12:02:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from albert.osu.cz (albert.osu.cz [193.84.224.12]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA12760 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 12:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from belkovic@localhost) by albert.osu.cz (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA00256; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:03:00 +0200 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:02:59 +0200 (MET DST) From: Josef Belkovics To: questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: ipx router Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk HI, I need run fbsd 2.2.1 as ip (gated) + ipx (IPXrouted) router. My favourite NetWare clients are using following ethernet frame types: ethernet_II, ethernet_802.2, ethernet_802.3 (novell terminology). Novell treats the three frame types as entirely different logical networks. Even on the same network interface. Three questions: 1) Does fbsd 2.2.1 know another frame than ethernet_II? 2) May i use something like: ifconfig ep0 inet 193.84.224.1, ifconfig ep0 ipx 0x101 (0x101 is novell extern net address on some NetWare server for ipx packet encapsulated in ethernet_II), ifconfig ep0 0x102 alias (ethernet_802.2), ifconfig ep0 0x103 alias (ethernet_802.3)? 3) Does IPXrouted correct route such case? Eg., three frames on the same interface. Regards, JPB (Josef Pavel Belkovics, Ostrava university)