Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:52:10 +0400
From:      igor <igor@soumenkov.com>
To:        <davidxu@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/156567: [kqueue] [patch] Add EV_CLEAR to AIO events in kqueue
Message-ID:  <1285373c046dd1bf18c6d93f9fb6b874@soumenkov.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F27A076.60009@gmail.com>
References:  <ef8ed17f05602de0bbbf3a247b81b224@soumenkov.com> <4F27A076.60009@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  

Hello David, 

The only thing I changed is the value of the flag,
this is the only meaning of the patch. I do not know who decided to
place the value there. 

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:06 +0800, David Xu
wrote: 

> On 2012/1/31 4:47, igor wrote:
> 
>> Dear all, What can I do
to get my patch finally applied or rejected (hope not :) ? My PR is not
even assigned to anyone. Should I do my best to become a committer (how?
:-) ? The solution I propose finally allows to use kqueue with aio in
multi-threaded applications. The only reason I created it is because I
wanted to use it for myself and it worked flawlessly. Please, anyone?
>

> It is better to allocate a member field from struct sigevent for
kevent
> flags, we have spare fields available there, please check the
union
> _sigev_un.
> 
> Regards,
> David Xu

-- 
Igor Soumenkov
  



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1285373c046dd1bf18c6d93f9fb6b874>