From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 16:20:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32F21065670; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FEB8FC18; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KR8Db-0007xS-G2; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:20:03 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m77GLEIX071929; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:21:14 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m77GL7qd071865; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:21:07 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:21:07 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Garrett Wollman Message-ID: <20080807162106.GA58873@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20080807103121.GA8415@regency.nsu.ru> <489AD614.3010904@FreeBSD.org> <18586.62597.988090.707524@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18586.62597.988090.707524@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/distfiles on FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:20:04 -0000 On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:11:33AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > We do not delete old distfiles because the space savings are marginal. > > There is value in retaining old distfiles, because they are often still > > needed even years later. > > There is also the issue of GPL compliance for the packages > (particularly the static package sets included with releases). Fair enough. However, find . -exec basename {} \; | sort | uniq -d finds plenty of duplicates, including some monsters like OOo_1.1.4_source.tar.gz, for instance. ./danfe