From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Jun 30 20:49:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA20896
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 20:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA20888
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 20:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA21525; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 20:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: James FitzGibbon <james@nexis.net>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1-960627-SNAP (2.1.5 BETA) is released. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 29 Jun 1996 15:06:09 EDT."
             <Pine.BSI.3.94.960629150313.11155A-100000@bdd.net> 
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 20:48:30 -0700
Message-ID: <21523.836192910@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> If this is still the case, could the code for 2.1.5 be left on the SUP
> servers as -stable for a periopd (one month?) after the release comes out
> ?  That way, the people who have been following -stable can do one final
> SUP, make world, and decide where to go from there without having to
> manually migrate systems (which, dependent on the number of systems, could
> be a nightmare.)

That was already more or less the intention - not to worry.

					Jordan