Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:10:42 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeVRRPd project status Message-ID: <425D6EB2.5010304@he.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <20050413184110.GB16696@diehard.n-r-g.com> References: <425196F0.4020309@x-trader.de> <6731347a839d85db456b1c5a33bcf0b5@mac.com> <864qeibp0v.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050413171132.B96104@electra.nolink.net> <20050413181931.GA16696@diehard.n-r-g.com> <425D6378.5080108@he.iki.fi> <20050413184110.GB16696@diehard.n-r-g.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Claudio Jeker wrote: >On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:22:48PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: > > >>Claudio Jeker wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>Did this recently change since looking at /etc/protocols it does not >>seem to be the case for most of them anyway? >> >> >> > >Most new protocols come from either some company, DARPA or some US >university. CARP was developped by neither of those three and it is long >known that IETF and IANA are just a pathetic bunch of company deputies. > > > However, it's an open process, anybody with roughly 30 people can start a WG. That's how protocols like "MS-CHAP" get "standardized". Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425D6EB2.5010304>