From owner-cvs-all Thu May 17 19: 0:11 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879E137B424; Thu, 17 May 2001 19:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bp@freebsd.org) Received: by relay.butya.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ACD4F2874D; Fri, 18 May 2001 08:59:59 +0700 (ALMST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.butya.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAF62874B; Fri, 18 May 2001 08:59:59 +0700 (ALMST) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:59:59 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov X-Sender: bp@lion.butya.kz To: Robert Watson Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/union union.h union_subr.c union_vnops.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 17 May 2001, Robert Watson wrote: > From owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org Fri Sep 03 00:00:00 1999 > > Yay! Any thoughts on how usable unionfs will be in the near future? Well, recent PR reminded me about an old tree with unionfs fixes. It was stable enough to complete 'make world' and build ports. nullfs and unionfs can be also fixed in -stable after MFC of vop_*vobject VOPs (however vnode locking issues will still be in effect). -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message