From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:03:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E759816A411 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7024425D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:03:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FeEZa-000DMi-9K; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:03:34 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeEZt-000CtZ-NA; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:03:53 +0400 To: Frank Laszlo References: <00bd01c6750a$b7c631e0$0a1610ac@prodcave.com> <4463603F.3050600@vonostingroup.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:03:53 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4463603F.3050600@vonostingroup.com> (Frank Laszlo's message of "Thu, 11 May 2006 12:03:11 -0400") Message-ID: <39169750@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tomcat55 port on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:03:38 -0000 On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:03:11 -0400 Frank Laszlo wrote: > I submitted a patch[1] to fix this issue some time ago, It has to do > with the way linux ports handle ARCH, since the linux emulation port > doesn't work on amd64, its forced to use i386 rpm's. Unfortunately my > efforts were shun by a brick wall, and no changes were made to address > this. I am going to repeat this one more time, ARCH should NEVER be > overwritten, here is yet another example of why. > [1]http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/91911 Seems that this problem shouldn't exist since updating of the port to use new bsd.linux-rpm.mk. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider