From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 18 18:12:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19839106566B for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Sudharshan.Varadarajan@netapp.com) Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89008FC08 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:12:15 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,444,1344236400"; d="scan'208,217";a="691162932" Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2012 11:12:09 -0700 Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.240]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q8IIC8LL005217 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.1.90]) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:12:08 -0700 From: "Varadarajan, Sudharshan" To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: Help: Macro limit in file "nd6.h" Thread-Index: AQHNlckcTj60jqOpgEa+Ee8EOC5Eiw== Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:11:54 +0000 Message-ID: <0694CF3623AD4B4FBCD500FFCA8CBC330547B036@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help: Macro limit in file "nd6.h" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:12:16 -0000 Hi all, When I was going through the file nd6.h, (../sysnetinet6/nd6.h) I find that= macro (prefix list size) "PRLSTSIZ" is defined as 10. Is there any particu= lar reason for having a lower value like this? Thanks Sudharshan