From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Dec 11 23:20:07 1995
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA12767
          for stable-outgoing; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 23:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA12732
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 23:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id XAA02250; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 23:20:02 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA00196; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 23:20:03 -0800
Message-Id: <199512120720.XAA00196@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.mt.net>
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bringing stuff into 2.1? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Dec 95 23:31:52 MST."
             <199512120631.XAA08347@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 23:20:02 -0800
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>All right.  What kind of time-frame are we looking at here?  The reason
>I'm asking is I want to shake out some of the more 'critical' portions
>of the merge (any of the kernel mods I'd like someone else to look over
>before they go in) and I don't want to push things to the wire.  Is a
>'drop-dead' date of February a workable goal, so it leaves us all of
>February for a Real(tm) beta-test cycle?

   Get your changes in before the end of January. Past that, I make no
promises. We want to get another release out sometime towards the end of the
first QT of '96.

-DG