From owner-freebsd-security Mon Apr 22 12:27:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B2E37B423 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [212.73.210.73]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 86E1516B16 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:03:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from LenConrad.Go2France.com [66.64.14.18] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id AB47770013E; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:24:55 +0200 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020422092852.05592668@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: LConrad@Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:02:47 -0500 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: DNS Question In-Reply-To: <20020422100301.A46936@cowbert.2y.net> References: <3CC3C250.28097.2D5EA4@localhost> <3CC3C250.28097.2D5EA4@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Bind has a notorious security track record. bind9 doesn't. Bind8's compromises are quite old by now. The biggest problem is that people don't stay current. >Are you running named in a jail? bind9 runs quite nicely and easily in a chroot. Len http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message