Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 09:22:42 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: Thomas Mueller <mueller6722@twc.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster new development Message-ID: <X%2BhEUk7K92mi%2BEca@home.opsec.eu> References: <20201226124150.7c494410@dismail.de> <6d0d128b-9a75-34f4-830c-d8be05ded9cb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > How is poudriere in that regard? I never used poudriere, have been intimidated by not wanting to use zfs or dialog4ports, or such an elaborate setup just to update one or a few ports. poudriere is really, really useful. Because it delivers a complete, consistent package repo of all the ports (with individual options). And it does so repeatable, down to one or several seperate os versions to build for or a specific point in time for the ports tree, with some individual options etc. > I found that poudriere uses dialog4ports; I much prefer to save options in a file such as Gentoo Linux does with make.conf and (NetBSD) pkgsrc does with mk.conf . That works as well. I have a checkout of the ports tree, use make config to define non-default port options. This stores the selected OPTIONs in /var/db/ports/, and poudriere uses those options just fine. Combined with lots of RAM, ZFS on SSDs and ccache, compilation is very fast. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?X%2BhEUk7K92mi%2BEca>