From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 12 05:19:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8522F37B401; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E97D43F3F; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:19:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA01507; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:19:16 +1000 Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:19:15 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20030412102945.GA35788@sunbay.com> Message-ID: <20030412221635.S3054@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200304111802.h3BI2Aw3065496@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030412160957.L2023@gamplex.bde.org> <20030412102945.GA35788@sunbay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Warner Losh cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/addr2line Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as Makefile.inc0 src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld Makefile src/gnu/ X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:19:25 -0000 On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 04:22:18PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Log: > > > libbinutils.a needs basename(3); when the latter is provided > > > by -legacy, liblegacy.a should come last in the LDADD list. > > > > binutils is supposed to use libiberty to avoid depending on local > > unportabilities like this. > > > It used to, up until recently. Now we pretend we always have > basename(3), by substituting one from -legacy. Indeed. My point is that adding to mistakes in -current doesn't help. Bruce