Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:19:15 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/addr2line Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar         Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as Makefile.inc0         src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld Makefile src/gnu/
Message-ID:  <20030412221635.S3054@gamplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030412102945.GA35788@sunbay.com>
References:  <200304111802.h3BI2Aw3065496@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030412160957.L2023@gamplex.bde.org> <20030412102945.GA35788@sunbay.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 04:22:18PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >   Log:
> > >   libbinutils.a needs basename(3); when the latter is provided
> > >   by -legacy, liblegacy.a should come last in the LDADD list.
> >
> > binutils is supposed to use libiberty to avoid depending on local
> > unportabilities like this.
> >
> It used to, up until recently.  Now we pretend we always have
> basename(3), by substituting one from -legacy.

Indeed.  My point is that adding to mistakes in -current doesn't help.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030412221635.S3054>