From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 13:15:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C20310656D6; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kensmith@buffalo.edu) Received: from localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (localmailb.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.5.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582A78FC0A; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CF035902; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:03:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CB75D18; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:03:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.acsu.buffalo.edu (smtp3.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.5.226]) by localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (Prefixe) with ESMTP id C91734FB7; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:03:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from [128.205.32.76] (bauer.cse.buffalo.edu [128.205.32.76]) (Authenticated sender: kensmith@buffalo.edu) by smtp3.acsu.buffalo.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF01449D27; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:03:45 -0500 (EST) From: Ken Smith To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20111117124210.GB2051@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <201111151849.pAFInR3K012609@svn.freebsd.org> <20111116.232828.343708041526200614.nyan@FreeBSD.org> <4EC3D40A.5040204@freebsd.org> <1321457050.78238.10.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117124210.GB2051@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-W+xRwUDXAWlKYsILZbLb" Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:03:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-PM-EL-Spam-Prob: : 8% Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Nathan Whitehorn , TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro Subject: Re: svn commit: r227536 - in head: release share/man/man7 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:15:22 -0000 --=-W+xRwUDXAWlKYsILZbLb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:17 -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote: > > > > In article<201111151849.pAFInR3K012609@svn.freebsd.org> > > > > Nathan Whitehorn writes: > > > > > > > >> Log: > > > >> Further automate production release generation by naming files = the right > > > >> things and generating checksums. > > > >> > > > >> Modified: head/release/generate-release.sh > > > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > >> --- head/release/generate-release.sh Tue Nov 15 17:53:29 2011 (r22= 7535) > > > >> +++ head/release/generate-release.sh Tue Nov 15 18:49:27 2011 (r22= 7536) > > > >> @@ -65,3 +66,12 @@ chroot $2 make -C /usr/src $MAKE_FLAGS b > > > >> chroot $2 make -C /usr/src/release release > > > >> chroot $2 make -C /usr/src/release install DESTDIR=3D/R > > > >> > > > >> +: ${RELSTRING=3D`chroot $2 uname -s`-`chroot $2 uname -r`-`chroot= $2 uname -p`} > > > > Should this be 'uname -m' rather than 'uname -p'? > > >=20 > > > There isn't a good option here when there is only one tag -- most of = the=20 > > > time, I imagine this will get specified in the builder's environment.= I=20 > > > picked uname -p because there are more possibilities than uname -m: i= t=20 > > > breaks the degeneracies for PPC, ARM, and MIPS, leaving only one for= =20 > > > i386/pc98. uname -m would have been the other way around. > > > -Nathan > > >=20 > >=20 > > Or both? We're heading in the direction of having both for the FTP > > server tree. > >=20 > > Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? >=20 > Can't we use one if they are equal? >=20 I'd prefer consistency. I really don't like any of the options we've got but I'm trying to view 9.0 as a "clean break" (we're being forced into making at least *some* changes due to the improved build infrastructure and the appearance of powerpc64) during which we should do what we can to avoid needing to change things down the road. After all the dust settles (people have a chance to get used to it) I picture a higher percentage of people being confused about why some architectures have one name while other architectures have two versus people being confused about all of them having two names. --=20 Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodor Geisel | --=-W+xRwUDXAWlKYsILZbLb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk7FBiMACgkQ/G14VSmup/aebQCghBWkNfMBaagsnl4t5tK0Wzkj /P8An1MjEkCXfq/UWCxyLP8ieMr/PVdf =EvUF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-W+xRwUDXAWlKYsILZbLb--