From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 8 16:02:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BB889AB for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7A3E81 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t28G2oYF077268 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:02:50 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t28G2oev077267; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:02:50 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:02:50 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D2017: Allow to disable alignment faults in the kernel configuration file Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D2017: Allow to disable alignment faults in the kernel configuration file X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: M2IwYjY0ZDAxMWY3ZTNlM2Y4OWM0M2JjYjUzIFT8cqo= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 16:02:51 -0000 ian added a comment. Where is the rest of this change? Just defining an option won't make it so. I've been wondering for a while why we still enforce alignment on armv6+ platforms that don't require it in hardware. I've been assuming that it's because we need extra support code or to change/remove some existing code, but I haven't had time to investigate it yet. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2017 To: zbb, imp, andrew, ian Cc: freebsd-arm