Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:30:21 -0500
From:      "Dean Weimer" <dweimer@orscheln.com>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc:        dkelly@HiWAAY.net
Subject:   Re: 5000' Ethernet?
Message-ID:  <CACC65656ED5C44FBA651F3D2B99B8081E4AE1CF@neuman.orscheln.oi.local>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Not directly FreeBSD related, but how much of a chance is there that =
two
>machines could communicate directly over 5,000 feet of cat5 with no
>special hardware?
>
>IIRC the classic Ethernet problem limiting the distance between the
>farthest points on a network had to do with timing and collisions. If
>these two NICs are configured full duplex then it seems one would have
>no idea how far away the other was due to timing issues.
>
>100baseT uses lower power drivers than 10baseT, so perhaps 10baseT =
would
>work better.

>In any case, have boxes of cat5 on order so as to find out myself.

>Are there any particular range extenders you have used and would
>recommend for making this task a sure thing on the first try? Perhaps I
>should put an inexpensive Ethernet switch at each junction to serve as =
a
>regenerative repeater?

I must say that all the information about Ethernet you have gotten about =
this has been quite interesting , but it seems a lot of people forgot =
that a simple answer is often the best answer.  Basically you don't need =
to know all the info about timing and how Ethernet handles collisions.  =
What you do need to know is that many people have research this, and =
that's why Cat5 cable standard has a maximum length of 100 meters or 328 =
feet, they have found this to be the maximum length that it reliably =
works.  In order to go 5000 feet, you would actually need 15 repeaters.  =
I have never tried to string that many switches or repeaters together =
though in my experience if you buy this many low end switches you will =
likely have one bad one in the bunch.  Plus there's a lot of places you =
would need power, and if this is outside now you have to take the =
weather into account.
It's unfortunate that wireless was ruled out as this would be the =
easiest method, and likely the cheapest.  The next option I would look =
to is definitely fiber as you had mentioned before.  I have only ordered =
fiber through our installer they come out string it polish and terminate =
the ends.  Then we just plug in the patch cables.  As for a supplier I =
checked some of the major vendors we use for cabling, they all offer =
only patch cables for fiber, my guess is that if you need to buy a =
spool, it would have to be from a whole sale outfit, and then you would =
need someone to put the ends on.  Your best bet would be to search for =
data and communication cable installation services in your area.  I =
would still quote wireless if it's feasible in the location as your =
customer (or management if this is for an in house operation) may change =
their mind after presented with the cost of a temporary fiber =
installation, and the problems a cat5 run would require overcoming.
Hope this helps some,
Thanks,
=A0=A0=A0=A0 Dean Weimer
=A0=A0=A0=A0 Network Administrator
=A0=A0=A0=A0 Orscheln Management Co
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Phone: (660) 269-3448
=A0=A0=A0=A0 Fax: (660) 269-3950





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACC65656ED5C44FBA651F3D2B99B8081E4AE1CF>