From owner-freebsd-security Thu Mar 13 7:10:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4C337B401 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.dev.itouchnet.net (itouchlabs.com [196.15.188.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F379B43F75 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:10:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bvi@itouchlabs.com) Received: from nobody by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with scanned_ok (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18tUMb-0001CV-00 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:11:21 +0200 Received: from itouchlabs.com ([196.15.188.2] helo=Beastie) by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18tUMa-0001CD-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:11:20 +0200 Message-ID: <002d01c2e972$98675e90$4508a8c0@Beastie> From: "Barry Irwin" To: , "security at FreeBSD" References: <20030313080852.A30434@sheol.localdomain> Subject: Re: SA-03:02.openssl for RELENG_4_6_2 vs. RELENG_4_5 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:08:53 +0200 Organization: iTouch Labs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Checked: This message has been scanned for any virusses and unauthorized attachments. X-iScan-ID: 4613-1047568281-36285@unconfigured version $Name: REL_2_0_4 $ Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Not directly answering your question, but an alternative is us build the openssl port with OVERWRITE_BASE defined. Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: "D J Hawkey Jr" To: "security at FreeBSD" Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:08 PM Subject: SA-03:02.openssl for RELENG_4_6_2 vs. RELENG_4_5 > Hello All. > > This is my last hope for "Are the SA-03:02.openssl patches for > RELENG_4_6_2 appropriate for RELENG_4_5?". > > After a dry-run, it appears that only the FreeBSD CVS version numbers > keep some half-dozen of the SA-03:02 patches from applying. > > FreeBSD released 4.4 with OpenSSL 0.9.6a. FreeBSD released 4.5 with the > same (though it may have had changes?). FreeBSD released 4.6.2 with > OpenSSL 0.9.e. > > OK. So as I go about cvsup'ing along the RELENG_4_5 tree, at p13, the > source is upgraded to OpenSSL 0.9.6e. At p18, it got an ASN.1 patch. So > did RELENG_4_6, at p10. Both RELENGs continued to get the same patches > until RELENG_4_5 support was dropped. So, up through RELENG_4_6_2 p7 > (p8 is SA-03:02), the two RELENGs had the same OpenSSL trees, right? > > Therefore: Does anyone know that the SA-03:02 patches for RELENG_4_6_2 > should not be applied to a RELENG_4_5 tree (after getting by the above > versioning SNAFU)? > > Thanks, > Dave > > -- > ______________________ ______________________ > \__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/ > \________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/ > http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message