From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 01:56:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405F716A4E6 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C530843D4C for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:56:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nakal@web.de) Received: from [217.81.251.45] (helo=[217.81.251.45]) by smtp.web.de with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.101 #91) id 1BFUZi-00010Y-00; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:56:22 +0200 From: Martin To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1082364979.856.3.camel@klotz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:56:20 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: nakal@web.de cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:56:30 -0000 On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 04:07, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > And in fact, it looks like I can add that, and decrease the size > by about 25-30%. That's a reduction in filespace, not just inodes. Will you try to add translation-support for the description messages of ports? Martin