From owner-freebsd-doc  Tue Mar 20 21:10: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AF637B721
	for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:10:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2L5A5677974;
	Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:10:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200103210510.f2L5A5677974@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Cc: 
From: obrien@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/25783: Add a new rule to the Committer Guid
Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR docs/25783; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: obrien@FreeBSD.org
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, dan@freebsddiary.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: docs/25783: Add a new rule to the Committer Guid
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:06:14 -0800 (PST)

 > Hmm, the only thing I see with this (the patch looks ok) is that the
 > rules in the CG were actually a list of rules that were drafted by
 > -core and voted on by the committers about a year or so ago.
 
 Correct.  Rules cannot be just added by anyone at a whim.  The rules
 when thru a long debative process and then were formally ratified.
 On this point, I object to this being committed.
 
 Also, The Rules were purposely kept to a minimal set.  This patch goes
 against that desire; and so I object to the patch on this point also.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message