From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 1 21:01:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEB5C03 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 21:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98547EB6 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 21:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45708 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2013 22:21:07 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Feb 2013 22:21:07 -0000 Message-ID: <510C2D24.60303@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 22:01:24 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: svn commit: r246204 - head/sys/arm/include References: <201302011026.r11AQVL9068427@svn.freebsd.org> <510C00CB.8000409@rice.edu> <510C1E7A.2090509@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Alan Cox X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 21:01:33 -0000 On 01.02.2013 21:23, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. before you make that assumption, please re-visit some the .. > lower-end integrated ethernet MACs in embedded chips. > > I don't know whether the Atheros stuff does (I think it does, but I > don't know under what conditions it's possible.) > > Maybe have it by default not return jumbo mbufs, and if a driver wants > jumbo mbufs it can explicitly ask for them. Jumbo frames do not see wide-spread use. If they are used, then in data centre LAN environments and possibly also inter-datacenter. That is high performance environments. I seriously doubt that lower-end ethernet MACs you're referring to fit that bill. -- Andre