From nobody Wed Apr 12 09:02:27 2023 X-Original-To: dev-ci@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PxGv06p9lz44ML2 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dchagin@heemeyer.club) Received: from heemeyer.club (heemeyer.club [195.93.173.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PxGv03H69z3ML0; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dchagin@heemeyer.club) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from heemeyer.club (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by heemeyer.club (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 33C92RMD089210; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:02:27 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from dchagin@heemeyer.club) Received: (from dchagin@localhost) by heemeyer.club (8.17.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 33C92Rkx089209; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:02:27 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from dchagin) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:02:27 +0300 From: Dmitry Chagin To: Zhenlei Huang Cc: FreeBSD Developers , "dev-ci@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD-main-amd64-test - Build #23332 - Still Unstable Message-ID: References: <264606855.2049.1681281945301@jenkins.ci.freebsd.org> <85087910.2053.1681287531385@jenkins.ci.freebsd.org> List-Id: Continuous Integration Build and Test Results List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-ci List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-ci@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-ci@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PxGv03H69z3ML0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:61400, ipnet:195.93.173.0/24, country:RU] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:39:16PM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > > > > On Apr 12, 2023, at 4:18 PM, jenkins-admin@freebsd.org wrote: > > > > FreeBSD-main-amd64-test - Build #23332 (c3c5e6c3e6c459839efa5184e67928c25384d246) - Still Unstable > > > > Build information: https://ci.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64-test/23332/ > > Full change log: https://ci.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64-test/23332/changes > > Full build log: https://ci.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64-test/23332/console > > > > Status explanation: > > "Unstable" - some tests are suspected being broken by the following changes > > "Still Unstable" - the failing test cases have not been fixed by these > > following changes and this is a notification to note that > > these changes have not been fully tested by the CI system > > > > Change summaries: > > (Those commits are likely but not certainly responsible) > > > > dc1c5138c3255cc9004a3842001ed6c5db8f4ea3 by zlei: > > powerpc: Use the existing CTLFLAG_RDTUN and CTLFLAG_RWTUN flag > > > > 69cb72b8728ba605d6cc8758480eca3fc6fd2ed6 by zlei: > > cam iosched: Use the existing CTLFLAG_RDTUN and CTLFLAG_RWTUN flag > > > > 5ff8018108278d06e024676c539e9f60f8189e83 by zlei: > > ice(4): Use the existing CTLFLAG_RWTUN flag definition > > > > 8bd9afe9e1821368f4bb0d39c8c6703bf5007fd1 by zlei: > > bxe(4): Use CTLFLAG_RDTUN flag definition > > > > deac4c7f0753841de8da4d7f37d7e49620b3bbb4 by zlei: > > iicbus(4): Use the existing CTLFLAG_RWTUN flag definition > > > > c3c5e6c3e6c459839efa5184e67928c25384d246 by zlei: > > tarfs: Use the existing CTLFLAG_RWTUN flag definition > > > > > > > > The failed test cases: > > > > 2 tests failed. > > FAILED: sys.kern.sigwait.test_wait_dequeue_sigchld_true > > > > Error Message: > > /usr/src/tests/sys/kern/sigwait.c:405: -1 != sig: sigwaitinfo() should fail, sig 20 != -1 > > The errno 20 is ENOTDIR by define. Weird. > 20 is a SIGCHILD, if dequeue is true sigwaitinfo should fail, dequeue true if kern.wait_dequeue_sigchld == 1 which is the default for FreeBSD. So, the knob is broken or perhaps sigwait tests were run in parallel > > > > FAILED: sys.netinet6.fibs6.fibs6_ifroutes1_success > > > > Error Message: > > atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details > >