From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 11:51:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEB6106564A for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40EC8FC0C for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2011 07:51:04 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.2.3-GA) with ESMTP id BGM89006; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:51:03 -0400 Received: from 209-6-41-114.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.41.114]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2011 07:51:03 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20055.34982.971729.989196@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:51:02 -0400 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <0BC4EAF0-178E-4722-AFE4-3DA5C15D9989@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110825064354.029bc16a@seibercom.net> <4E562E66.3030001@FreeBSD.org> <20110825073341.3c302109@seibercom.net> <20110825080147.29ad7a71@seibercom.net> <0BC4EAF0-178E-4722-AFE4-3DA5C15D9989@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: ruby port downgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:51:04 -0000 Stanislav Sedov writes: > Meanwhile, we continue to work on fixing the major issued people > reported (some portupgrade glitches, ability to use the newer > ruby-gems under ruby 1.9), and hopefully we'll be able to make it > default again soon enough. Is there an estimate - even a rough one - when that will be? Respectfully, Robert Huff (who would like people to stop and think about how rarely this hapopens) \