From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 29 09:46:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA21658 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA21644 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 09:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA04828; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 09:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199709291635.JAA04828@rah.star-gate.com> to: Joe Beiter cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Plug and Play naivety In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Sep 1997 00:12:52 +0930." <199709291442.AAA00386@word.smith.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 09:35:46 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Joe, Questions related to sound cards to the multimedia mailing list. Luigi has a sound driver which works with Sujal Patel's PnP package. Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of Mike Smith : > > > > My BIOs also claims to support plug and play. In Freebsd (2.2.2-R) I have > > set the sound card (soundblaster 16) to the same settings Windoze 95 picked > > up but the Kernel still can't find the card. > > Your BIOS is leaving the card disabled because it is not a device > required for booting. This is correct behaviour according to the PnP > standard document. > > Windows '95 will be performing resource allocation and activating the > card. There is no code in FreeBSD 2.2.* to do this. > > > I was going to seek out this beta driver until I saw Janice's posting. What > > is my recourse? Do without the sound card or find another OS? > > That depends on your requirements. I wouldn't be exactly inclined to > chose an operating system based on whether or not it supported my > soundcard, but your criteria may vary. > > > I'm already "doing without" PPP due to an obscure problem between pppd and > > a particular release of Bay code. > > ... you could always try the usermode 'ppp', which is slightly more > actively maintained, or attempt to work through your problem with Paul > Mackerras. (The developer/maintainer of the 'pppd' program.) > > > ]1. mail from Sujal notes that "if your motherboard supports PnP > > ]devices, then you don't need this code". What does this mean? > > It's not entirely correct, in that it implies that the PnP BIOS will > leave all devices enabled. Some older systems did this; it is not > universal. > > mike > > >