From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 06:04:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CB816A4B3 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h2.liquidneon.com (h2.liquidneon.com [38.116.133.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2742B43F75 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:04:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bdavis@house.so14k.com) Received: (qmail 88577 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 13:04:07 -0000 Received: from 12-235-234-120.client.attbi.com (HELO mccaffrey.house.so14k.com) (@12.235.234.120) by h2.liquidneon.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 13:04:07 -0000 Received: by mccaffrey.house.so14k.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C55A011D; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:04:06 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:04:06 -0600 From: Brad Davis To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030918130406.GA68759@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <20030917081828.GC43577@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com> <48322287.20030917233959@blue.calx.nl> <1063835258.6538.245.camel@papa.wdm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1063835258.6538.245.camel@papa.wdm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Re[2]: Verisign fun. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:04:09 -0000 I just did the same, and I am pretty happy with djbdns. Patches also exist for djbdns to do something similar. Brad On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 01:47:38PM -0800, W.D. McKinney wrote: > I saw that on the ISC bind9-users list also. We have moved off our bind9 > servers to djbdns a couple days agao and there are patches for that > version also, but we have decided to let the dust settle as impact is > minimal right now. > > I always say, "Only the experienced walk with a limp." > > Dee > > > On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 13:39, Walter Hop wrote: > > [in reply to secabeen@pobox.com, 17-9-2003] > > > > >> I don't know about you guys but the verisign redirecting all > > >> unregistered .com/.net domains is annoying. Someone pointed this out to > > >> me. > > >> > > >> http://achurch.org/bind-verisign-patch.html > > > > > > If you want to do something like this, here's the official ISC patch: > > > > > > http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html > > > > If you do this patch, test it carefully. I have had serious resolution > > problems with the patch on FreeBSD 4.8, and somebody else on bind9-users > > with Solaris had the same. > > > > Unless you host applications or networks that break, I would suggest > > waiting a few days to see if an updated version becomes available. > > > > I am nullrouting the IP addresses of Verisign's spam webservers for now. > > > > cheers, > > walter > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"